The Offence of Theft under the 1968 Theft Act should have been straightforward. Unfortunately, the courts have interpreted it to become illogical and confusing. Discuss

A semi optimistic article was published unspoilt previous to the thieving trans proceedion 1968 in the redbrick rightfulness Review, regarding the overtake of the therefore law of theft, identifying some of the grass-roots problems instigating the major rethink (1): ·making the law easier to understand ·Reducing complexity and question ·To focus on self-possession rights and not possessory rights ·To overcome a myriad of inconsistencies under the then current law ·To give up a large amount of rare and redundant statutory and common law offences ·Reduce the material body of offences by newborn concepts and redefinitions ·Expanding the ambit of some offences The Theft roleplay 1968 replaced the larceny Act 1916, to come into force on Jan 1 1969 as an embodiment of the recommendations of the CLRCs report on Theft and cogitate Offences (2). Commentaries of executable interpretations by respected authors followed (3) as well as vituperative remarks refl ecting the general morale of the critics regarding the overall performance of the new act: ·The Act is no masterpiece (4) ·The law (is) purged with chivalrous puzzlement.and (is) a depressing exercise (5) ·rather at haphazard development of important doctrines in the law of theft (6) prof smith expressed his excitement regarding new challenges (7), and also express his frustration through angry remarks at the illogical decisions much(prenominal) as Hinks (8). ------------------------------------- 1.         R.

Stuart, law Reform and the Reform of the Law of theft, Modern Law Rev (1967) p609 2.         CMnd 2977; J.K. Mac! leod, Restitution under the Theft Act 1968, CLR (1968) p577 3.         J.M. Collins, The Theft Act and its Commentators CLR (1968) p638 4.         J.M. Collins, The Theft Act and its Commentators CLR (1968) p638 at 647 5.         D.W. Elliott, imposture under the Theft Act (1972) CLR p625 6.         L. Koffman, The Nature of Appropriation, CLR (1982) p33 7.         J.C. Smith, Obtaining cheques... If you involve to dismay a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay